Just Jean and Simply Jean are the same Jean? You might be wondering.
I used FireFox with an Add-Ons called ShowIP which show me the IP address of the website i am currently browsing.
Just Jean at http://jean.sg has an IP address 208.87.242.2
Simply Jean at http://simplyjean.com also has an IP address 208.87.242.2
Both sites has the same DNS Name servers: ns2.unixbsd.info, ns3.unixbsd.info
Both sites also has the same Google Analytics user account: UA-732099-2
Simply Jean claimed to multi-bloggers blog while Just Jean is a single user blog.
Simply Jean - The Blog, is currently authored by more than 1 contributor, all of whom post under the moniker of Simply Jean.
Who are the rest of the contributor? Is Just Jean Simply Jean or a contributor? This is the first multi-bloggers blog I came across which does not credits its contributors.
Simply Jean has a min of 1 post everyday since Just Jean posted “Help needed: I was molested by a friend while I was asleep” on the 11th Jun 2008.
On 18th Jun 2008, Simply Jean has a post “Another molest case?!“. Who is the contributor? Just Jean? Simply Jean does not show the name of the contributor.
Coincidentially, on the 22nd Jun 2008, there are no post on Simply Jean when Just Jean declared that she lost and it might be her last post. Will Just Jean continue to post on Simply Jean?
Is Just Jean a contributor of Simply Jean or the owner of Simply Jean? Are they the same Jean? You decide.
You can view http://208.87.242.2 with IE but the same IP address was blocked by Mozilla FireFox:
This web site at 208.87.242.2 has been reported as a web forgery and has been blocked based on your security preferences.
Web forgeries are designed to trick you into revealing personal or financial information by imitating sources you may trust.
Entering any information on this web page may result in identity theft or other fraud.
Popularity: 5% [?]
Like this post? Subscribe to my RSS feed and get loads more!
34 comments
sgPing on June 23, 2008 at 5:10 pm
Just Jean and Simply Jean are the Same Jean | Richard Palace dot Com…
Yes, Just Jean and Simply Jean are the same Jean. You might be wondering which post of her makes me so sure that they are the same Jean. Well, there is a faster method. 100% sure….
ignorantsoup on June 23, 2008 at 5:27 pm
Hi,
No offence meant, but what is this post supposed to mean?
Actually many of us already know months ago that Just Jean blogs in SimplyJean, and that SimplyJean is not a blog based on a sole person, but a few people who post there.
Actually, IP and DNS doesn’t say anything isn’t it? People can share the same webspace host. On the same server. Not too sure about it..
DK on June 23, 2008 at 5:58 pm
Maybe you should read the “About” section first before coming into conclusion.
“Simplyjean is currently authored by more than 1 contributor.”
This has been a known fact to a lot of people already.
Richard Palace on June 23, 2008 at 6:10 pm
“Simplyjean is currently authored by more than 1 contributor.”
Yes that is correct, but who are the contributors?
Beside that, the posts do not show which contributors posted them.
DK on June 23, 2008 at 6:22 pm
Richard: I believe the other contributors have their rights to remain anonymous. All I can tell you is that there is more than 1 contributor and I know some of them personally.
If you read the entries carefully, you can also tell the different style in some of the entries.
xee on June 23, 2008 at 11:46 pm
who cares if they are the same or not.. why so kpo?
Tianhong on June 24, 2008 at 12:16 am
yes quite right. this has been made known by many at least half a year ago
Richard Palace on June 24, 2008 at 12:17 am
DK,
Yes, I agree with you that contributors have the rights to remain anonymous, but they can still used nickname or code like DK, SJ, JJ. It does not give away their identity.
xee,
Yes, perhaps I am kpo. Thanks for dropping by
DK on June 24, 2008 at 12:39 am
Richard: I think that’s their personal preference. Why bother so much about it?
shanen on June 24, 2008 at 6:38 am
Gahment had also said 2 high ranking staff were sacked for the kas salamat escape, but who are they? How do they look like?! There are also toto winners every week! Who? I hope it’s shanen ! LOL
molemole on June 24, 2008 at 9:57 am
Actually I don’t find anything wrong with this entry. Its afterall his/her/him/they/their blog. At the very least, we even ‘bothered’ to take a look at this. =P
Justiciar Hablion on June 24, 2008 at 12:17 pm
There’s nothing wrong with this post, and is most likely interesting to most people (read: not just “regular pingsters”) who have been following the Just Jean saga (and it’s not their fault when the top 10 is dominated on the issue).
The same way you post about how you broke up with your girlfriend or how pretty that necklace that you bought is, Richard can post about his suspicions of two blogs being owned by the same person.
shanen on June 24, 2008 at 3:17 pm
If you guys don’t know, those anti this post nicks are “friend” of jean. You see your friend kanna hantum surely you will put in one leg help rite??
It is very easy to side your friend, especially DK, he is very narrow minded one lar, that guy hor no standard one. Everywhere he go he will protect his friend majiam like his friend is innocent.
Aiya jean so cheapskate, what else is surprising?
molemole on June 24, 2008 at 3:37 pm
DK is not narrow minded. He is a good friend. There is nothing wrong with speaking up for a friend. Thats what friends are for.
Cheers everybody!
DK on June 24, 2008 at 6:27 pm
Shanen: I didn’t say that it is wrong to post this. I saw an error in the post and I came in to explain to Richard. I’m never anti this thread.
And when Richard ask why didn’t they do this and that, my only answer is that it’s their preferance and we shouldn’t bother too much about it.
You seems to think you know a lot about me.
ignorantsoup on June 24, 2008 at 7:11 pm
@shanen: Well you are right. Friends will help friends, it’s nothing wrong, except that Dk didn’t help, but rather clarified that there are many authors in Simply Jean. However, this post in itself seems to be hinting that Jean is dishonest, using both Just Jean and Simply Jean to further it’s cause. Well I am not a friend of Jean and I don’t know her, but I believe that this matter is blown out of proportion and both sides made mistakes. It’s time to move on. What is the point of taking sides and pointing at each other? The irony is that the anti-jean camp seems to only know how to call people names. Some call Jean a slut, now call Dk narrow minded. Name calling is totally childish. Without knowing the true facts of what happened, it is childish and stupid to take sides and give names. I am sure you would agree with me that name calling is stuff for kids, wouldn’t you?
shanen on June 24, 2008 at 9:53 pm
DK : Clarify? Can you tell me why are you so sure what you said is 100% correct? If you cannot, then you are in no position to clarify.
Ignorantsoup : I don’t believe for a minute anybody can clarify anything except the author of simply jean and just jean. Unless you telling me DK authors one of them????? As long you’re not authoring those 2 sites, you cannot 100% prove what you’re saying to be the truth and if so how can that be a clarification? More like just another opinion. Aiya people wanna call who slut also none of your business lah. If jean cheated me of $50K and i call her a bitch is my right, tio bo? It’s also your right to call me anything you want what…..freedom of speech ma….just say what you feel…. don’t tell me you believe in being a hypocrite meh?
shanen on June 24, 2008 at 9:58 pm
molemole : Ook DK is not narrow minded because he is a good friend to you. I am narrow minded becaues you don’t know me LOL. There is nothing wrong in speaking up for friends because that’s what friends are for, only thing is that along the way facts would be distorted and the result is inaccurate judgement , all because he is your friendz….
molemole on June 24, 2008 at 10:11 pm
Then pai seh liao lor because DK is not lao niang’s good fren and, I didn’t for once think that you were at any point in time narrow minded. I believe assumptions are the worst kind of judgements. Wouldn’t you agree?
Have a great week ahead everyone. =)
ignorantsoup on June 24, 2008 at 10:37 pm
@shanen:I’m sorry then, can I change it to DK tried to clarify? Not that it matters. Actually right, no one’s arguing whether Dk’s supposed clarification, or trying to clarify (in case you want to pick on certain usage of words), is correct or incorrect, or whether it’s the truth, or not. Did I say that it’s an issue? If I did, I sincerely apologize.
I take offence at your choice of words, but of course, as you say freedom of speech. I believe in freedom of responsible speech, and I don’t believe that freedom of speech is good for the childish. To clarify, yes it is your business and I have no right to say that you cannot. I did not call you names actually, I merely asked if you would agree that name calling are stuff for kids, of which your answer is no, and fine by it. I mean, if you want to make the internet such a bloody unwelcoming place, so be it. Jean’s a bitch, so be it. I just think that name calling is kids stuff. Period.
shanen on June 24, 2008 at 10:54 pm
Molemole : You said in a comment DK is a good friend. Come on lar lao niang…..don’t need to go that low k………be a man…oops i mean a woman….
shanen on June 24, 2008 at 10:58 pm
Ignorantsoup : Come on lar…it’s my right to call you or anybody anything i want and it’s also your right to call me childish or mature….fair what…..i don’t know why you are sounding majiam like someone just kanna poked at the kar chng lidat….chill mate…life is a joke so laugh at it….
ignorantsoup on June 24, 2008 at 11:02 pm
And I think it’s a stupid right. Ok? Anything else to discuss?I already said I never call you childish or mature and I’m not calling you names. -_-” As I quote from molemole, “I believe assumptions are the worst kind of judgements. ” Period.
DK on June 25, 2008 at 12:15 am
Ignorantsoup & Molemole: I think let’s leave Shanen alone. He not making any sense anymore. Let him be.
Shanen: I don’t think there is any need for me to proof something that is already a known fact to a lot of people. If you don’t believe what I said here, so be it. Let it be man. After all, it’s none of my business.
shanen on June 25, 2008 at 12:47 am
ignorantsoup : “I believe assumptions are the worst kind of judgements. ” - Please tell that to your good friend DK.
DK : Yeah right! when you can’t beat the logic then it makes no sense to you. Do i have to remind you that most of your blog post makes no sense? Do i have to remind you that the reason why your blog is receiving a healthy readership is because people loves laughing at your terrible english? Your english is so damn bad I would be damn ashame of myself if i were you. All your grammars are wrong. Yeah it doesn’t make sense to you because you haven’t got the ability to see it. Yeah right!
DK on June 25, 2008 at 1:31 am
Yawn.
molemole on June 25, 2008 at 9:26 am
Well my statement - DK ‘is’ a good friend is not equivalent to - DK is my good friend. Its all about how you read an English statement. I was merely attempting to assumingly describe his relationship with Jean which I also assumingly thought you had the ability to see.
I am curious about the fact of your knowledge on DK’s posts which are written in bad english *coughs* unless you bothered to read them (which I don’t) BUT never mind that, I seriously don’t need to read the explanations.
As for my definition of Lao Niang - it actually means Your Bitchy Mother Me La hahaha. Well yea I enjoy calling myself whatever I like too.
Anyway, its always good to start the day with well wishes. So Good morning, Good luck and have a pleasant week ahead. This will be my last comment.
To the Author - this is afterall an insightful post.
shanen on June 25, 2008 at 11:17 am
Molemole : Xiao zha bor, i don’t have problem understanding English, you have a problem in deciding to whom is he a good friend to.
ignorantsoup on June 25, 2008 at 1:30 pm
Hmm..sorry but i’m having trouble conversing with someone who’s standard of the english language is so pathetic that “he is a good friend” reads as “he is my good friend”.
I would like to suggest we leave this place alone. It is unfair to the author of this post to have pesky people hanging around this post, me included. If anyone wants to continue discussing further, feel free to comment at my own blog. After all, that is my own blog. But it may be too lousy for certain atas member of society. This shall me my last comment on this post. Thank you and have a nice day everyone.
shanen on June 25, 2008 at 2:33 pm
ignorantsoup : eh xiao tar por, if you say a banana is delicious right, don’t come and tell me you were refering to Osama saying that banana is delicious. You have no right to tell me what Osama think of that banana because you are not Osama. See, all scared of losing face in this discussion until run away.
The Ignorantsoup - Maki, My Life and Me on June 25, 2008 at 3:33 pm
[...] For the background on what happened, read this. [...]
Nobody on June 25, 2008 at 6:11 pm
Nobody here, but just a quick comment.
I’ve been following the ‘Just Jean Molest Saga’ and I must admit that like Richard, I suspect Simply Jean is Just Jean, and vice versa. Or more correctly, one of the authors of Simply Jean is the same author of the Just Jean blog.
There are many connections but the most obviously is none other than dear Darryl Kang himself. You can find DK speaking out empathetically for his friend on both “Jean blogs” and even here, doing some sort of damage control I suppose. Also, do note that neither DK, nor either authors, have outright dismissed the connection between the two Jeans. Which just confirms to me that it is true.
Why is this important, you may ask? Well, I personally think that it’s rather disingenuous for the Simply Jean blog to (pretend to) take a neutral stand and maybe even side John, when the Just Jean blog was crying blue murder.
I do not assume that the Simply Jean post was maybe authored by someone other than Jean, herself. However, neither am I naive to think that the author(s) of Simply Jean can remain 100% unbiased & neutral when one of their, if not THE MAIN, blogger has been allegedly molested.
And that, my friends, is why I think this post from Richard is news-worthy.
ignorantsoup on June 25, 2008 at 6:54 pm
Good comment. I agree with you.
not-john on June 30, 2008 at 9:18 am
You are absolutely right, Simply Jean and Just Jean is the same person.
DK has no right to comment as he is a friend of Just Jean - his name was mentioned in her blog and he was one of Just Jean’s friend who send he off at the airport.
His comments further strengthen my believe that Just Jean and Simply Jean is same person.